LegitVerdict

Independent domain report

Is bioma.com legit?

Yes - bioma.com is very likely legitimate and safe to use, on the evidence: it has valid HTTPS from a trusted authority and a multi-year track record.

Last analysed 6 Jul 2026 4 days ago

LegitVerdict verdict for
bioma.com
Looks legit
64
out of 100
Likely safe
LegitVerdict Trust Score
A 1-100 algorithmic rating of bioma.com, computed from the breakdown below.
The breakdown3 separate axes
39
Risk
67
Trust
58
Buyer-safety
Valid SSL, encrypted connectionDV
Operator is hard to reach1/3 channels
2 signal(s) flagged for attentionsee below

On the evidence, yes. The checks that catch scam operations - security, transparency, track record - all land on the right side for the business, with the detail open for inspection below.

Organization CH - .com HTTPS - secure
64/100
LegitVerdict score
39/100
Risk (lower is safer)
A
SSL grade
Niche
Popularity
71%
Confidence

01 / The verdict

The short answer

On the evidence, yes. The checks that catch scam operations - security, transparency, track record - all land on the right side for the business, with the detail open for inspection below.

In short: LegitVerdict rates Bioma SA (bioma.com) 64/100 - the evidence supports it as legitimate. The score breaks down into risk 39/100 (lower is safer), trust 67/100 and buyer-safety 58/100 (higher is safer to transact), at 71% confidence, computed from published, weighted signals.

On its public pages, bioma.com runs an organization operating from CH. Valid HTTPS from a trusted authority, almost no reachable contact details and a multi-year domain history are on record. That combination is exactly the kind of transparency a trustworthy operation provides and a throwaway site usually hides.

Three separate scores - risk, trust and buyer-safety - are computed from independent evidence, so a strength in one can never hide a weakness in another. For this organization, all three point the same direction: a functioning business with a clean record.

A reminder on scope: this is an automated assessment of the website and domain - not a legal finding, not financial advice, and not an endorsement of what the operator publishes or sells.

How to read this report. Every score below is backed by the data that produced it - registration, security, hosting and transparency are open for inspection. This is an automated, algorithmic risk indicator for a website and domain. It is not a legal finding, an accusation, or an endorsement of any product. Report inaccurate data.

Analysed 6 Jul 2026 4 days ago

Re-check this domain

02 / The three scores

Risk, trust & buyer-safety

Three separate scores, each from its own evidence, so it is always clear what is being measured. Here is how bioma.com performs on each - and the signal breakdown that rolls up into them.

Risk - how dangerousLow
39
/ 100 risk

There is no blacklist entry and no malware flag, but the profile has rough edges a careful buyer should read first. The score reflects accumulated small frictions, not a single alarm.

Trust - track recordStrong
67
/ 100 trust

What stands out is consistency - the registration, hosting and contact story stayed coherent across every source we checked. Established operations look exactly like this.

Buyer-safety - safe to transactGuarded
58
/ 100 buyer

The buyer-safety picture is mixed: some transaction protections are in place on bioma.com, others - documented below - are not, so a cautious shopper uses a protected payment method and keeps records.

Signal breakdown

The three scores above roll up these signal groups - each a grouped level from the live evidence, not the individual weights.

Radar of grouped signal levels, each 0 to 100 where higher is stronger: Registration 84 of 100, Security 64 of 100, Reputation 52 of 100, Transparency 47 of 100, Content 81 of 100. A group with no live data is drawn at the neutral midpoint, not as a low score. RegistrationSecurityReputationTransparencyContent
Domain & registration
84/100
Technical & server
64/100
Reputation & reviews
52/100
Business & transparency
47/100
Social & content
81/100

Higher is stronger. Grouped from the live signals in the itemised evidence below - the exact weights are public on the methodology page.

03 / At a glance

Highlights & points to note

The fastest read on the domain: what is working in its favour, and the items worth attention. The full evidence for each is further down the report.

Positive signals
Domain age: 29 years old.
Registration period: registered for 33 years.
SSL certificate: valid DV certificate (Let's Encrypt).
Content quality: 1322 words, 1/4 legal pages linked.
Social presence: facebook, instagram, linkedin, x, youtube.
Points to note
Contact details: minimal contact details.
Response speed: slow response (3781 ms).

04 / The full record

Every detail, on file

The raw data behind the scores, grouped by area - registration, security, hosting, performance, reputation. Open any tab to inspect the evidence yourself.

Domain age
29 years
RegisteredToday
A long, continuous registration history is a strong trust signal and uncommon among short-lived scam domains.
Registration period
33 years
Multi-year renewal horizons are typical of operators planning to stay.
TLD
.com - normal profile
Extension abuse profile from the public TLD risk dataset.
Registrar
Network Solutions, LLC
Registrar of record, cross-checked against abuse-tier data.
WHOIS visibility
Public registrant
Redaction is GDPR-default and treated as neutral.

05 / The evidence, itemised

Every signal, explained

Open any signal to read what it means for bioma.com and why it scores the way it does. Each one is tagged with the score it feeds.

Response speedslow response (3781 ms)Watch - ai

The operation responds slowly (slow response (3781 ms)).

Slow infrastructure is a weak negative on its own, but it compounds the picture when other care signals are missing.

Contact detailsminimal contact detailsWatch - risk

The operation is hard to reach - minimal contact details is all the page analysis surfaced.

When something goes wrong, an unreachable operator converts a problem into a loss - which is why this signal carries real weight.

Domain age29 years oldClean - risk

29 years old of continuous existence is on record for bioma.com - a track record that predates most scam domain lifecycles many times over.

Age is hard to fake and expensive to wait out, which is exactly why scoring systems weight it heavily.

Registration periodregistered for 33 yearsClean - trust

The operator paid ahead: registered for 33 years. That is money spent on a future, which disposable sites never spend.

Scam domains are nearly always registered for the single cheapest year; a long horizon is a quiet but honest trust marker.

WHOIS privacyregistrant details publicClean - risk

The operation publishes its registration identity rather than hiding behind a proxy service.

Public registrant data has become rare since GDPR, so when an operator volunteers it, it counts as extra transparency.

TLD risk profilestandard TLD (.com)Clean - risk

Bioma.com lives on a standard, well-policed extension (standard TLD (.com)).

Nothing about the extension moves the risk needle.

Server locationhosted in CHClean - risk

The operation resolves to real infrastructure: hosted in CH.

Where a site is hosted matters less than how stably it is hosted - both look normal for the business.

SSL certificatevalid DV certificate (Let's Encrypt)Clean - risk

The operation serves a valid DV certificate (Let's Encrypt) - the certificate chain, hostname and validity window all check out.

Certificates are cheap but discipline is not - a correctly maintained TLS setup is table-stakes competence made visible.

Search engine blockingopen to search enginesClean - risk

The operation is fully open to search engines (open to search engines).

Visibility is accountability: a site that wants to be found accepts being examined.

Mail infrastructureoperational mail server (MX)Clean - risk

This data point was unavailable when the operation was last analysed.

Missing data never lowers a score - the engine simply notes reduced confidence and moves on.

Email authenticationemail authentication configured (SPF)Clean - risk

This data point was unavailable when the operation was last analysed.

LegitVerdict treats absent measurements as unknowns, not negatives; they will fill in on a future recompute.

Security hardeningHTTPS-forcedClean - risk

We could not obtain this measurement for bioma.com during the latest check.

Missing data never lowers a score - the engine simply notes reduced confidence and moves on.

Address specificityaddress details on the pageClean - risk

The operation shows location/address details to visitors.

A stated location anchors a business in a jurisdiction where rules apply.

Product category riskorganizationClean - risk

The business falls in the organization category.

Everyday categories carry no inherent risk premium.

Declared type vs evidencedeclared organization_genericClean - risk

This data point was unavailable when the operation was last analysed.

LegitVerdict treats absent measurements as unknowns, not negatives; they will fill in on a future recompute.

Social presencefacebook, instagram, linkedin, x, youtubeClean - trust

Linked social profiles are present: facebook, instagram, linkedin, x, youtube.

Social history is expensive to fabricate at scale, which makes it a useful corroborating signal.

Technology stackmagento, woocommerce, wordpress, wpmlClean - ai

Under the hood the operation uses magento, woocommerce, wordpress, wpml - mainstream, maintained technology.

Recognisable technology also parses cleanly for machines, feeding the AI-readiness axis.

Registrar reputationNetwork Solutions, LLCNeutral - risk

The registrar on record is Network Solutions, LLC, which carries no particular reputation either way.

No reputational weight applies here - the engine simply records the fact.

Abuse-feed listingnot on any monitored abuse feedNeutral - risk

Bioma.com is not on any monitored abuse or phishing feed we mirror.

A clear feed check clears one specific danger; it does not by itself vouch for the site.

Traffic popularity (Tranco)not in the global top-1M (normal for niche sites)Neutral - trust

No Tranco entry exists for bioma.com.

The engine treats a missing rank as zero information - niche sites are not punished for being niche.

Industry associationslimited public affiliationsNeutral - trust

We found limited public affiliations during the page analysis.

This signal only ever adds; it never subtracts.

Trust sealsno trust seals displayedNeutral - trust

No trust seals displayed on the pages we analysed.

The engine notes the absence purely for completeness.

Company registration (BG registry)no company ID published (not all jurisdictions publish one)Neutral - risk

No company identifier is published on bioma.com for registry verification.

If the operator claims this page, a verified company record can be attached to the report.

Payment methodsno payment methods detectedNeutral - risk

No payment methods detected on the pages we could analyse.

Some checkouts reveal options only after login; the engine treats this as unknown, not negative.

Review independenceno on-site testimonialsNeutral - risk

On-site testimonials for bioma.com are counted as marketing, not as evidence.

Reviews hosted by the seller cannot be audited, so LegitVerdict assigns them no trust value in either direction.

Content quality1322 words, 1/4 legal pages linkedNeutral - trust

The operation publishes a workable but not deep public surface - 1322 words, 1/4 legal pages linked.

Nothing here moves the score much in either direction.

06 / The AI-readiness lens

How AI search reads bioma.com

A secondary, owner-facing lens - it does not affect the safety verdict above. Users increasingly ask an assistant before a search box, so these checks measure whether the models can actually read, understand and cite bioma.com. AI-readiness scores 7.5/10.

A maintained, recognisable platform serves clean HTML that parses predictably. AI systems can extract what the operation sells, where it operates and how to reach it.

Server-readable content
Core content present in raw HTML
Valid HTTPS
Trusted certificate on the live handshake
HTTPS enforcement
Plain HTTP redirects to the secure site
Open indexing
No noindex directive on public pages
Structured data
JSON-LD entity markup in the page
Named identity
og:site_name or equivalent identity markup
Response speed
First byte under 1.5 s
Stable resolution
DNS resolves to working infrastructure
Grounding data
Phone or address available for entity grounding
Recognisable platform
Mainstream stack that parses predictably

LegitVerdict reads the live page the way a browser and an AI crawler do - these checks reflect what models actually see. Accuracy is the entire product.

Own this site? Manage your report.
Verify your domain to add your business details, respond on the record, and unlock the full AI-readiness fix list for this report. This verdict is grounded in independent data sources: IP geolocation by DB-IP.
Verify your domain

07 / Staying safe

How to protect yourself

Practical, evidence-based steps for this domain - whether you are about to transact or want to be sure.

Smart shopping with bioma.com

Nothing in the record suggests bioma.com is unsafe. Standard online-shopping hygiene still applies:

  • Pay with a method that offers buyer protection - a card or PayPal lets you dispute a charge if an order goes wrong.
  • Keep the order confirmation and any correspondence until the goods arrive as described.
  • Check that prices and delivery terms match elsewhere - a clean trust profile does not guarantee the best price or product.
  • If something feels off during checkout, stop and contact the operator using the published details before paying.

Multi-source safety check

The live abuse and phishing sources could not be reached for bioma.com this analysis, so no listing result is shown. A missing check is not read as danger.

Independent abuse and phishing sources checked for bioma.com. Each row shows only what that source reports; a domain absent from a list is shown as no listing found, never as safe.
Source What it checks Result
abuse.ch Feodo Tracker Licence: CC0 (abuse.ch) The hosting IP address against known botnet command-and-control servers. Source unavailable Could not be reached for this analysis.
abuse.ch SSL Blacklist Licence: CC0 (abuse.ch) The hosting IP address against malicious-SSL and C2 fingerprints. Source unavailable Could not be reached for this analysis.
Criminal / hijacked netblock list Licence: Free for commercial use (internal signal) The hosting netblock against a list of criminal or hijacked IP ranges. Source unavailable Could not be reached for this analysis.
Open phishing-domain blocklist Licence: MIT (Phishing.Database) The domain name against an open-source phishing-domain blocklist. Source unavailable Could not be reached for this analysis.

Each row reflects only what that authoritative source publishes. A domain absent from a list is shown as “no listing found”, never as an endorsement - absence of a listing is not proof of safety, and a source we could not reach is not read as danger. Sources and their licences are documented on the methodology page.

Official pages. Direct links to bioma.com's own pages, for reference: Homepage. These links are nofollow - listing them is not a LegitVerdict endorsement.

08 / How LegitVerdict scores

Method & limits

Scoring methodology reviewed by The LegitVerdict Team, Search & AI-visibility engineering, technical SEO. This report was generated automatically on 6 Jul 2026 from live sources and states its own confidence (71%).

Inputs
What we read

Registration and ownership records, security and hosting signals, reputation and popularity data, and the domain's own public pages - contacts, payments, content and structured data. Where a business is officially registered, we cross-check the public company record too.

Scoring
Three separate scores

Signals are sorted into risk, trust and buyer-safety and scored independently against a documented methodology - so a strong score in one area can never paper over a weakness in another, and every point is explainable. A secondary AI-readiness lens measures machine visibility only.

Limits
What it is not

An automated assessment of a website and domain - not a legal finding, financial advice, or an endorsement of any product. A trust score is a probability signal stated with its confidence; owners can verify and correct the record for free.

Own bioma.com?

Verifying takes a few minutes and the only condition is control of the domain. Verified owners can add details, respond on the record, and unlock the full AI-readiness fix list.

  • 01  Add a DNS TXT record, or upload a small HTML file
  • 02  We confirm you control the domain - that is the only condition
  • 03  Verified badge goes live - a followed link is granted above the trust threshold
Verify this domain - free Report inaccurate data

Verification proves control, not endorsement. Links are nofollow by default and only become followed for verified domains above the trust threshold.

Show your LegitVerdict score

Embed bioma.com’s live LegitVerdict badge on your own site. The image is served from LegitVerdict and shows the current score straight from our record, so it cannot be faked; the link points back to this report. Verify ownership to upgrade it to the “Verified by LegitVerdict” badge.

Live LegitVerdict trust badge for bioma.com

How it works: paste the code once. Because the badge is an image served live by LegitVerdict, it always reflects bioma.com’s current score and links back to this report — no script, no API, nothing to maintain. It works as soon as LegitVerdict is live.

09 / Questions

People also ask

Is bioma.com legit?

Yes, on the data we verified. Valid HTTPS from a trusted authority, almost no reachable contact details and a multi-year domain history are on record. Nothing in the profile matches the patterns fraud systems are trained to catch.

What do reviews say about bioma.com?

Instead of user reviews anyone can manufacture, the verdict here is built from verifiable signals. On that evidence this organization looks solid: Valid HTTPS from a trusted authority, almost no reachable contact details and a multi-year domain history are on record. Treat on-page testimonials as promotion, not proof.

Is bioma.com safe to use?

Yes, with the usual care: the security record is clean and the operator is reachable. Use a protected payment method as you would anywhere.

Is bioma.com a scam?

No scam markers were found. Valid HTTPS from a trusted authority, almost no reachable contact details and a multi-year domain history are on record. The signals look like an established business rather than a throwaway site built to vanish.

Is bioma.com trustworthy?

On the evidence, yes. Valid HTTPS from a trusted authority, almost no reachable contact details and a multi-year domain history are on record. Those are the marks of a trustworthy operator, and every one is open for inspection in the record below.

What is bioma.com's LegitVerdict Trust Score?

The LegitVerdict Trust Score for bioma.com is 64/100 (3.2 out of 5) - an algorithmic rating of the domain's trustworthiness. It breaks down into risk 39/100 (lower is safer), trust 67/100 and buyer-safety 58/100 (higher is safer to transact), at 71% confidence, from 26 live signals. The methodology and weights are public.

Who is behind bioma.com?

For bioma.com, the public record shows an operation based in CH, address details published openly and linked social profiles. The operator can verify ownership to attach full company details to this report.

How is this different from other scam checkers?

Transparency is the difference. The methodology and weights are public, every signal on this page shows its evidence and its contribution, and the verdict is an explainable algorithmic score - not an opaque grade with a paid appeal process.