01 / The verdict
The short answer
Consistent with a legitimate site. The live checks we ran come back clean; the record below shows each one.
In short: LegitVerdict rates google.bg at 61/100, computed from the live signals below at 60% confidence. It breaks into risk 36/100 (lower is safer), trust 59/100 and buyer-safety 63/100 (higher is safer to transact).
google.bg presents itself as a live website. The signals this quick check could read are laid out below, each with the evidence behind it.
Instead of one blended number, this report keeps risk, trust and buyer-safety apart, so it is always clear what is being measured.
A reminder on scope: this is an automated assessment of the website and domain - not a legal finding, not financial advice, and not an endorsement of what the operator publishes or sells.
Analysed 31 Aug 2026 just now
Re-check this domain02 / The three scores
Risk, trust & buyer-safety
Three separate scores for google.bg, each from its own evidence. Band: likely safe - confidence 60%.
Nothing in the live checks carries danger weight. This is a grouped read from what we could reach - not the full record.
Track-record signals we could read (registration, hosting) roll up here. Fewer sources than the full pipeline, so confidence is stated below.
What a buyer can verify before paying - encryption and a reachable operator. Missing items are counted as unknown, never as danger.
Signal breakdown
The three scores above roll up these signal groups - each a grouped level from the live evidence, not the individual weights.
- Domain & registration
- 54/100
- Technical & server
- 75/100
- Reputation & reviews
- 50/100
- Business & transparency
- 53/100
- Social & content
- 41/100
Higher is stronger. Grouped from the live signals in the itemised evidence below - the exact weights are public on the methodology page.
03 / At a glance
Highlights & points to note
The fastest read on the domain: what is working in its favour, and the items worth attention.
04 / The full record
Every detail, on file
The raw data behind the scores, grouped by area. Open any tab to inspect the evidence yourself.
05 / The evidence, itemised
Every signal, explained
Open any signal to read what it means for google.bg and why it scores the way it does.
Registrar reputationregistered and active in the national registry (register.bg)Neutral - risk
Registered and active in the national registry (register.bg).
A neutral reading counts as live evidence but moves the score neither way.
TLD risk profilestandard TLD (.bg)Clean - risk
Live check on google.bg: standard TLD (.bg).
A confirmed signal like this is consistent with a real, maintained operation.
SSL certificatevalid certificate (Google Trust Services)Clean - risk
Live check on google.bg: valid certificate (Google Trust Services).
A confirmed signal like this is consistent with a real, maintained operation.
Response speedresponds in 126 msClean - risk
Live check on google.bg: responds in 126 ms.
A confirmed signal like this is consistent with a real, maintained operation.
Search engine blockingopen to search enginesClean - risk
Live check on google.bg: open to search engines.
A confirmed signal like this is consistent with a real, maintained operation.
Mail infrastructureoperational mail server (MX)Clean - risk
Live check on google.bg: operational mail server (MX).
A confirmed signal like this is consistent with a real, maintained operation.
Email authenticationemail authentication configured: SPF + DMARC (p=reject)Clean - risk
Live check on google.bg: email authentication configured: SPF + DMARC (p=reject).
A confirmed signal like this is consistent with a real, maintained operation.
Security hardeningX-Frame-OptionsNeutral - risk
X-Frame-Options.
A neutral reading counts as live evidence but moves the score neither way.
Trust sealsno trust seals displayedNeutral - trust
No trust seals displayed.
A neutral reading counts as live evidence but moves the score neither way.
Contact detailsno contact details foundNeutral - risk
No contact details found.
A neutral reading counts as live evidence but moves the score neither way.
Address specificityaddress details on the pageClean - risk
Live check on google.bg: address details on the page.
A confirmed signal like this is consistent with a real, maintained operation.
Social presenceno linked social profilesNeutral - trust
No linked social profiles.
A neutral reading counts as live evidence but moves the score neither way.
Content quality12 words, 1/4 legal pages linkedCaution - trust
Live check on google.bg: 12 words, 1/4 legal pages linked.
This is a point to note, weighted and capped - it can lower the score but never decide the verdict alone.
06 / The AI-readiness lens
How AI search reads google.bg
A secondary, owner-facing lens - it does not affect the safety verdict above. These checks measure whether models can read, understand and cite google.bg.
The live check reads the homepage the way a browser and an AI crawler do. The full AI-readiness score runs in the deep pipeline; here we surface the structural checks it is built from.
LegitVerdict reads the live page the way a browser and an AI crawler do - these checks reflect what models actually see. Accuracy is the entire product.
07 / Staying safe
How to protect yourself
Practical, evidence-based steps for this domain - whether you are about to transact or want to be sure.
Nothing in the live checks marks google.bg as unsafe. Standard online-shopping hygiene still applies:
- Pay with a method that offers buyer protection - a card or PayPal lets you dispute a charge if an order goes wrong.
- Keep the order confirmation and any correspondence until the goods arrive as described.
- Check that prices and delivery terms match elsewhere - a clean trust profile does not guarantee the best price or product.
- If something feels off during checkout, stop and contact the operator using the published details before paying.
Multi-source safety check
Independent abuse and phishing sources checked for google.bg. A source that could not be reached is not read as danger.
| Source | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| abuse.ch Feodo TrackerLicence: CC0 (abuse.ch) | The hosting IP address against known botnet command-and-control servers. | No listing foundChecked - this source has not listed the domain. |
| abuse.ch SSL BlacklistLicence: CC0 (abuse.ch) | The hosting IP address against malicious-SSL and C2 fingerprints. | No listing foundChecked - this source has not listed the domain. |
| Criminal / hijacked netblock listLicence: Free for commercial use (internal signal) | The hosting netblock against a list of criminal or hijacked IP ranges. | No listing foundChecked - this source has not listed the domain. |
| Open phishing-domain blocklistLicence: MIT (Phishing.Database) | The domain name against an open-source phishing-domain blocklist. | Source unavailableCould not be reached for this analysis. |
Each row reflects only what that authoritative source publishes. A domain absent from a list is shown as “no listing found”, never as an endorsement - absence of a listing is not proof of safety, and a source we could not reach is not read as danger. Sources and their licences are documented on the methodology page.
08 / How LegitVerdict scores
Method & limits
Scoring methodology reviewed by The LegitVerdict Team, Search & AI-visibility engineering, technical SEO. This report was generated automatically on 31 Aug 2026 from live sources and states its own confidence (60%).
Registration and ownership records, security and hosting signals, and the domain's own public homepage - encryption, reachability, contact and content. The live check reads fewer sources than the full pipeline, and says so in its confidence.
Signals are sorted into risk, trust and buyer-safety and scored independently against a documented methodology - so a strong score in one area can never paper over a weakness in another, and every point is explainable.
An automated assessment of a website and domain - not a legal finding, financial advice, or an endorsement of any product. A trust score is a probability signal stated with its confidence; owners can verify and correct the record for free.
Verifying takes a few minutes and the only condition is control of the domain. Verified owners can add details, respond on the record, and unlock the full AI-readiness fix list.
- 01 Add a DNS TXT record, or upload a small HTML file
- 02 We confirm you control the domain - that is the only condition
- 03 Verified badge goes live - a followed link is granted above the trust threshold
Verification proves control, not endorsement. Links are nofollow by default and only become followed for verified domains above the trust threshold.
Embed google.bg’s live LegitVerdict badge on your own site. The image is served from LegitVerdict and shows the current score straight from our record, so it cannot be faked; the link points back to this report.
09 / Questions
People also ask
Is google.bg legit?
On the live evidence, the checks we could run on google.bg are consistent with a legitimate site. This is about the website and operator, not any specific product, which a buyer should assess separately.
What do reviews say about google.bg?
Instead of user reviews anyone can manufacture, the verdict here is built from verifiable live signals. On the live evidence, the checks we could run on google.bg are consistent with a legitimate site.
Is google.bg safe to use?
The live check looks at encryption, reachability and public threat feeds. On the live evidence, the checks we could run on google.bg are consistent with a legitimate site. Standard buyer hygiene always applies.
Is google.bg a scam?
There is no automated finding of a scam here; this is a risk indicator, not an accusation. On the live evidence, the checks we could run on google.bg are consistent with a legitimate site.
Is google.bg trustworthy?
On the live evidence, the checks we could run on google.bg are consistent with a legitimate site. Every signal on this page is open for inspection in the record above.
What is google.bg's LegitVerdict Trust Score?
The LegitVerdict Trust Score for google.bg is 61/100 - an algorithmic rating computed from the live signals above, stated at 60% confidence. The methodology and weights are public.
Who is behind google.bg?
The live check reads only the public record. The operator can verify ownership to attach full company details to this report.
How is this different from other scam checkers?
Transparency is the difference. The methodology and weights are public, every signal shows its evidence, and the verdict is an explainable algorithmic score - not an opaque grade with a paid appeal process.